I am sitting in the United Terminal about to board a plane bound for LAX. Just experienced the Dulles Diamond Checkpoint. Has anyone else heard of this? It is a new service provided to select passengers to expedite the screening process for travel-ready adults. While in line, I heard several people mention they had registered for it. Funny, I had never heard of it. Bottom line, it saved about 20 mins of security lines on a Sunday morning. I am a big fan.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
To Change Washington, Move Out?
Not sure where the time has gone these past few months. Oh wait, it has been consumed by economic crisis, debates and election coverage. Living in Washington, I get a lot of friends asking me "What is the problem with Washington? How is this economic rescue plan really going to work? Are these politicians serious?" I assure them, I have no insider information and I am reading the same articles and editorials as the rest of America.
One editorial that stuck out to me was a NYTimes Opinion piece that appeared on September 9th. Simply titled, To Change Washington, Move Out, this piece made some interesting recommendations for "real change" in Washington. The main idea - decentralize the executive branch government. The article discusses how top heavy Washington is, possibly plagued by its own bureaucracy. It also attacks the cost of living for us Washingtonians. Does it really chase away talent from our town?
Don't get me wrong, I do think that the cost of living in the district is pretty high, but I don't know of talented people who when offered the job they want, stop and say, "I just don't think this is going to work out - the cost of living is too high here." Let's be honest, they will happily take the job and move out to the Virginia suburbs to save a buck or two.
The author makes another interesting suggestion - move the IRS to New Orleans and DEA to Michigan. He also offers up Homeland Security and the Department of Veterans Affairs. I wonder if the government would be willing to take on this telecommuting challenge. These agencies might have to finally consider upgrading their information technology, networks and bandwidth capabilities. This move would be a great start in the Government 2.0 movement.
More transparency, less bureaucracy and of course job creation in areas that need it. It would be great if the government entered into a partnership with Cisco or IBM to properly wire towns to host government agencies. Since most work is done now on computers, e-mail and the Web, would it really take that much change? Training could be virtual, performance review meetings can be hosted through telepresence suites, and reporting can be pushed via web portals. Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. Let's see if the next administration takes a bite of the idea. Does anyone else like this idea?
One editorial that stuck out to me was a NYTimes Opinion piece that appeared on September 9th. Simply titled, To Change Washington, Move Out, this piece made some interesting recommendations for "real change" in Washington. The main idea - decentralize the executive branch government. The article discusses how top heavy Washington is, possibly plagued by its own bureaucracy. It also attacks the cost of living for us Washingtonians. Does it really chase away talent from our town?
Don't get me wrong, I do think that the cost of living in the district is pretty high, but I don't know of talented people who when offered the job they want, stop and say, "I just don't think this is going to work out - the cost of living is too high here." Let's be honest, they will happily take the job and move out to the Virginia suburbs to save a buck or two.
The author makes another interesting suggestion - move the IRS to New Orleans and DEA to Michigan. He also offers up Homeland Security and the Department of Veterans Affairs. I wonder if the government would be willing to take on this telecommuting challenge. These agencies might have to finally consider upgrading their information technology, networks and bandwidth capabilities. This move would be a great start in the Government 2.0 movement.
More transparency, less bureaucracy and of course job creation in areas that need it. It would be great if the government entered into a partnership with Cisco or IBM to properly wire towns to host government agencies. Since most work is done now on computers, e-mail and the Web, would it really take that much change? Training could be virtual, performance review meetings can be hosted through telepresence suites, and reporting can be pushed via web portals. Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. Let's see if the next administration takes a bite of the idea. Does anyone else like this idea?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
